Connect with us

News

Lifestyle risks affect women’s hearts worse than men’s, study finds

Published

on

Lifestyle and health factors that are linked with heart disease appear to have a greater impact on cardiovascular risk in women than men, a new study has shown.

While factors such as diet, exercise, smoking and blood pressure have long been linked with heart disease risk, the new study is the first to show that these associations are collectively stronger in women than men. A

ccording to the researchers, the findings suggest that sex-specific screening or risk assessment approaches could give a more accurate picture of cardiovascular risk and better motivate people to adopt heart-healthy habits.

Maneesh Sud, MD, PhD is assistant professor in the department of medicine, interventional cardiologist and clinician scientist at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto and the study’s lead author.

The researcher said: “For the same level of health, our study shows that the increase in risk [related to each factor] is higher in women than in men—it’s not one-size-fits-all.

“This is novel and something that hasn’t been seen in other studies.”

The study focused on eight factors associated with heart disease: diet, sleep, physical activity, smoking, body mass index, blood glucose, lipids and blood pressure.

Overall, the results showed that women were more likely to have fewer negative risk factors and more positive ones compared with men.

However, women with more negative risk factors faced a more pronounced increase in their chance of a heart attack, stroke or other cardiovascular event compared to men with a similar risk factor profile.

Sud said: “We found that women tend to have better health than men, but the impact on outcomes is different.

“The combination of these factors has a bigger impact in women than it does in men.”

The researchers analysed data from over 175,000 Canadian adults who enrolled in the Ontario Health Study between 2009-2017.

None of the participants had heart disease at baseline and about 60 per cent were women.

Each participant was classified as having ideal or poor health in terms of each of the eight risk factors, and these scores were combined to calculate an overall risk factor profile as poor (fewer than five positive factors or more than three negative factors), intermediate (five to seven positive factors) or ideal (ideal across all eight factors).

During a median follow-up period of just over 11 years, researchers tracked the incidence of seven heart disease outcomes—heart attack, stroke, unstable angina (chest pain that results from restricted blood flow to the heart), peripheral arterial disease (narrowed blood vessels in the arms or legs), heart failure, coronary revascularization (procedures to open blocked arteries) and cardiovascular death—among participants in each of the three groupings.

In the study population, significantly more women were categorised as having ideal health, with 9.1 per cen of women and 4.8 per cen of men scoring a perfect 8 out of 8.

Women were also less likely to be categorized as having poor health, with 21.9 per cen of women and 30.5 per cen of men falling into this category.

In terms of individual risk factors, women were more likely than men to have ideal diet, blood glucose, cholesterol and blood pressure, while women were slightly less likely than men to have ideal physical activity levels.

After adjusting for age, the results showed that participants of both sexes saw an elevated risk of heart disease if they had poor or intermediate health compared to those with ideal health, but these differences were more extreme in women than men.

Women with poor health had nearly five times the risk of heart disease as women with ideal health, while men with poor health had 2.5 times the risk of heart disease as men with ideal health.

Women with intermediate health had 2.3 times the risk as those with ideal health, while men with intermediate health had 1.6 times the risk as those with ideal health.

Further study is needed to understand how each factor might be affecting outcomes differently in men and women based on either biological or sociocultural factors, the researchers said.

The researchers plan to conduct additional analyses to determine whether there are any differences in risk factor impacts among people of different racial and ethnic groups or among women before and after menopause.

News

Finding could help identify diabetes patients at risk of vascular damage

Published

on

The longer someone has type 2 diabetes, the higher their cardiovascular disease risk, and changes in red blood cells may help explain it, new research suggests.

The study found red blood cells from patients with long-term diabetes harmed blood vessel function, while no such effect was seen in those newly diagnosed.

After seven years of follow-up, the blood cells of people initially diagnosed had developed the same harmful properties.

Zhichao Zhou, associate professor at Karolinska Institutet and lead author, said: “What really stands out in our study is that it is not only the presence of type 2 diabetes that matters, but how long you have had the disease.

“It is only after several years that red blood cells develop a harmful effect on blood vessels.”

Researchers at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden studied animals and patients with type 2 diabetes.

They identified microRNA-210, a small RNA that helps regulate gene activity, as a possible early biomarker of cardiovascular risk.

When its levels were restored in red blood cells, blood vessel function improved.

Eftychia Kontidou, doctoral student and first author, said: “If we can identify which patients are at greatest risk before vascular damage has already occurred, we can also become better at preventing complications.”

The researchers are now investigating whether the biomarker can be used in larger population studies.

Continue Reading

News

Routine vaccines may protect against dementia, research finds

Published

on

Routine vaccines for adults may reduce dementia risk, a review of more than 100 million people suggests.

The research found both flu and shingles vaccines were associated with a lower risk in adults aged 50 and over.

The shingles (herpes zoster) jab was linked to a 24 per cent lower risk of any dementia and a 47 per cent lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

A joint Italian-Canadian neuroscience review points to a pattern that public health experts say is hard to ignore, suggesting vaccines against common infections may offer long-term protection against the UK’s leading cause of death.

With an ageing population, about two million people are projected to be living with dementia in the UK by 2050.

Prof Sir Andrew Pollard is director of the Oxford Vaccine Group and former chair of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.

He said: “Vaccines for pneumonia, shingles, and influenza in older adults have been shown to reduce the risk of serious infections and hospitalisation caused by these diseases.

“But studies in the past few years have raised the intriguing possibility that vaccination could also provide a welcome reduction in the risk of dementia, a disease which places a huge burden on society and the NHS.”

A separate large-scale randomised trial in Wales compared shingles vaccines Zostavax and Shingrix to address the “healthy user effect”, where people who get vaccinated tend to be more health-conscious. As both groups were vaccinated, this helped control for that bias.

The results showed those receiving the newer Shingrix vaccine had a substantially lower risk of developing dementia over subsequent years.

Dr Maxime Taquet, clinical lecturer in psychiatry at Oxford, who led that study, said: “The size and nature of this study makes these findings convincing, and should motivate further research.”

Continue Reading

News

Food preservatives linked to increased diabetes and cancer risk, study finds

Published

on

Higher intake of some food preservatives is linked with increased risks of type 2 diabetes and cancer, two studies suggest.

The findings were based on diet and health data from more than 100,000 French adults in the NutriNet-Santé study between 2009 and 2023.

Of 17 preservatives analysed individually, higher consumption of 12 was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes.

Higher intake overall was linked to a 47 per cent increase in incidence.

In the cancer research, several preservatives were linked to higher risk. Potassium sorbate was associated with a 14 per cent higher risk of overall cancer and a 26 per cent higher risk of breast cancer, while sodium nitrite was linked to a 32 per cent higher risk of prostate cancer.

Overall preservative intake was not linked to cancer incidence in the cohort.

Researchers said several compounds could alter immune and inflammatory pathways, possibly triggering cancer development.

Both were observational studies, so they show association rather than cause.

Mathilde Touvier, a coordinator of the diabetes study, said: “This is the first study in the world on the links between preservative additives and the incidence of type 2 diabetes.

“Although the results need to be confirmed, they are consistent with experimental data suggesting the harmful effects of several of these compounds.”

Prof William Gallagher, of University College Dublin, who was not involved with the research, said: “These higher rates of cancer are modest but are significant when taken at a population-based level in terms of potential impact.”

The researchers called on manufacturers to limit unnecessary preservatives and backed advice for consumers to eat fresh, minimally processed foods.

Continue Reading

Trending

Agetech World