Connect with us


Innovative prostate cancer treatment awarded $1.7m research grant



Scientists researching an ‘ancient virus’ treatment for metastatic prostate cancer have been awarded $1.7 million by the US Department for Defense.

Oncology expert Charles Spruck’s laboratory at Sanford Burnham Prebys in California, is focused on developing new, effective, and non-toxic treatments for patients with advanced cancers.

Now the associate professor and his team will use the Department of Defense grant to advance a novel therapeutic approach to treating prostate cancer called viral mimicry, that utilises ancient viruses embedded in our genomes to trick the body into thinking it has an infection.

The hope is to have a clinic-ready drug available within the next three years.

Dr Spruck explained: “In viral mimicry, the body thinks there’s an infection, which kicks the immune system into high gear.  With the immune system activated, cancer cells are more responsive to treatment, and tumour growth slows. All of this can happen without triggering treatment resistance, which could be a huge benefit for treating prostate cancer.”

Prostate cancer is the second most diagnosed cancer in men worldwide and the fifth leading cause of cancer death. Mainly affecting men over 50, the risk of developing it increases with age. The most common age to be diagnosed is between 70 and 74 years.

According to the World Health Organisation, there were an estimated 1.4 million new cases of prostate cancer and more than 375,000 deaths from the disease in 2020 alone.

Currently there is no cure for metastatic prostate cancer, but it can be treatable for some time. Many patients outlive their prostate cancer, even those with advanced disease.

Charles Spruck

Dr Spruck said: “Many cases of prostate cancer are treatable, so people don’t think of it as a major public health issue. But when prostate cancer becomes metastatic or resistant to therapy – such as hormone therapy – it can ultimately become a fatal disease. One of the benefits of this approach is that it works in a completely different way, so it’s not as susceptible to resistance.”

The new approach takes advantage of a bizarre evolutionary feature of our genomes called endogenous retroviruses (ERVs).

These are small sequences in our genomes left behind by viruses that infected our ancient ancestors. ERVs have been found in the genomes of early humans, such as Neanderthals, but are thought to have first emerged in animals hundreds of millions of years ago.

Unlike regular viruses, ERVs do not make us sick. Instead, they bounce around our genomes and help control gene expression.

“ERVs are inactive, so they don’t produce proteins the way regular genes do,” Dr Spruck said. “In this study, we discovered that we can reactivate these viruses selectively in cancer cells and essentially fool the body into thinking it needs to trigger an immune response against the tumour.”

Dr Spruck’s team has already discovered a potential drug that can induce viral mimicry in prostate cancer cells. However, the drug is not potent or selective enough to enter the clinic.

One of the goals of their project is to develop more potent compounds that can induce viral mimicry, which could lay the foundation for tomorrow’s prostate cancer treatments.

Dr Spruck said: “Something very exciting about this work is that it has the potential to move to the clinic extremely quickly. We hope to have a drug ready for the clinic within three years.”

In addition to prostate cancer, the viral mimicry approach could be effective across a range of treatment-resistant cancers. The researchers are already exploring the approach in ER+breast cancer, in which up to 50% of patients experience a relapse due to treatment resistance.

“We initially discovered viral mimicry in breast cancer, and we suspected it could work in other cancers,” Dr Spruck said. “This project is helping us see how far we can take this unique approach, and I’m confident we’ll be able to apply it more broadly in the future as we continue to learn more about how it works.”



Air pollution linked to increased hospital admission for heart and lung diseases



Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution is linked to an increased risk of hospital admission for major heart and lung diseases, find two large US studies, published by The BMJ.

Together, the results suggest that no safe threshold exists for heart and lung health.

According to the Global Burden of Disease study, exposure to PM2.5 accounts for an estimated 7.6% of total global mortality and 4.2% of global disability adjusted life years (a measure of years lived in good health).

In light of this extensive evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated the air quality guidelines in 2021, recommending that an annual average PM2.5 levels should not exceed 5 μg/m3 and 24 hour average PM2.5 levels should not exceed 15 μg/m3 on more than 3-4 days each year.

In the first study, researchers linked average daily PM2.5 levels to residential zip codes for nearly 60 million US adults (84 per cent white, 55 per cent women) aged 65 and over from 2000 to 2016. They then used Medicare insurance data to track hospital admissions over an average of eight years.

After accounting for a range of economic, health and social factors, average PM2.5 exposure over three years was associated with increased risks of first hospital admissions for seven major types of cardiovascular disease – ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, valvular heart disease, and thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Compared with exposures of 5 μg/m3 or less (the WHO air quality guideline for annual PM2.5), exposures between 9 and 10 μg/m3, which encompassed the US national average of 9.7 μg/m3 during the study period, were associated with a 29% increased risk of hospital admission for cardiovascular disease.

On an absolute scale, the risk of hospital admission for cardiovascular disease increased from 2.59% with exposures of 5 μg/m3 or less to 3.35% at exposures between 9 and 10 μg/m3.

“This means that if we were able to manage to reduce annual PM2.5 below 5 µg/m3, we could avoid 23% in hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease,” say the researchers.*

These cardiovascular effects persisted for at least three years after exposure to PM2.5, and susceptibility varied by age, education, access to healthcare services, and area deprivation level.

The researchers say their findings suggest that no safe threshold exists for the chronic effect of PM2.5 on overall cardiovascular health, and that substantial benefits could be attained through adherence to the WHO air quality guideline.

“On February 7, 2024, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) updated the national air quality standard for annual PM2.5 level, setting a stricter limit at no more than 9 µg/m3. This is the first update since 2012. However, it is still considerably higher than the 5 µg/m3 set by WHO. Obviously, the newly published national standard was not sufficient for the protection of public health,” they add.*

In the second study, researchers used county-level daily PM2.5 concentrations and medical claims data to track hospital admissions and emergency department visits for natural causes, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory disease for 50 million US adults aged 18 and over from 2010 to 2016.

During the study period, more than 10 million hospital admissions and 24 million emergency department visits were recorded.

They found that short term exposure to PM2.5, even at concentrations below the new WHO air quality guideline limit, was statistically significantly associated with higher rates of hospital admissions for natural causes, cardiovascular disease and respiratory disease, as well as emergency department visits for respiratory disease.

For example, on days when daily PM2.5 levels were below the new WHO air quality guideline limit of 15 μg/m3, an increase of 10 μg/m3 in PM2.5 was associated with 1.87 extra hospital admissions per million adults aged 18 and over per day.

The researchers say their findings constitute an important contribution to the debate about the revision of air quality limits, guidelines, and standards.

Both research teams acknowledge several limitations such as possible misclassification of exposure and point out that other unmeasured factors may have affected their results. What’s more, the findings may not apply to individuals without medical insurance, children and adolescents, and those living outside the US.

However, taken together, these new results provide valuable reference for future national air pollution standards.

Continue Reading


Home health care linked to increased hospice use at end-of-life – study



Patients who had previously received home health care had a higher likelihood of accessing hospice care at the end of their life, according to a new study.

Researchers, whose findings are published in the Journal of Palliative Medicine, examined the home health care and hospice care experiences of more than two million people.

Using Medicare data, researchers found when individuals received home health care before the last year of their life, they had higher odds of using hospice care than those who had never received home health care.

Researchers said this association underscores the potential benefits of receiving end-of-life care in the comfort of one’s home.

As the aged population increases, the findings also show the need for more resources in the health care sector and staff training in end-of-life care.

Home health care services including skilled nursing, therapy, social work and aide services are used to maintain functioning or slow decline in health. Hospice care provides similar services but is intended for those with life expectancies of six months or less and is focused on pain relief, minimising hospital visits and providing comfort and support. Both services provide patients the opportunity to receive more personalised care in their home.

Researchers say home-based care also encourages greater involvement of family caregivers in the caregiving process.

Olga Jarrín, senior author of the study, the Hunterdon Professor of Nursing Research at the Rutgers School of Nursing and director of the Community Health and Aging Outcomes Laboratory within the Rutgers Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, commented: “In addition to benefits for the patient, hospice care also provides resources and support to help family caregivers cope with the physical, emotional and practical challenges of caring for a loved one at the end of life.”

Hyosin (Dawn) Kim, research assistant professor at Oregon State University and first author of the study, added: “By providing personalised care, reducing hospitalisations, fostering family involvement and support, and improving symptom management, home-based care can enhance the quality of end-of-life experiences for patients with terminal illnesses and their families.”


Continue Reading


Sleep programme shows promise in those with memory problems – study



A new study has shown promising results in improving sleep and quality of life in individuals living with memory problems.

A group of researchers from Penn Nursing, Penn Medicine, Rutgers School of Nursing, and Drexel University’s College of Nursing and Health Professions, have delved into the efficacy of a non-pharmacological approach in a trial known as the Healthy Patterns Sleep Program.

The study involved 209 pairings of community-residing individuals with memory problems and their care partners. Participants were assigned to either the Healthy Patterns Sleep Program, which consisted of one-hour home activity sessions administered over four weeks, or a control group that received sleep hygiene training, plus education on home safety and health promotion.

The Healthy Patterns Sleep Program trained care partners in timed daily activities such as reminiscence in the morning, exercise in the afternoon and sensory activities in the evening that can decrease daytime sleepiness and improve nighttime sleep quality.

Nancy Hodgson, PhD, RN, FAAN, the Claire M. Fagin Leadership Professor in Nursing and Chair of Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, who led the study, said: “The results from this study provide fundamental new knowledge regarding the effects of timing activity participation and can lead to structured, replicable treatment protocols to address sleep disturbances. Overall, the Healthy Patterns program resulted in improved QOL compared to an attention-control group.”

The findings also indicate that, compared to a control group, the four-week Healthy Patterns program improved sleep quality among persons living with memory issues who had depressive symptoms or poor sleep quality.  The study indicates the Healthy Patterns Intervention might need a longer dose to induce improvements in other sleep-wake activity metrics.

The study’s significance lies in its confirmation of the effectiveness of behavioural interventions in not only improving quality of life and addressing sleep quality issues in this population, but also potentially reducing care partner burden and overall care costs for persons living at home with memory problems.

Continue Reading